Comparison
Self-hosted OpenClaw vs EasyClaw
OpenClaw is the open-source agent runtime. Run it yourself or use EasyClaw—same power, zero setup. Here’s how they compare.
Side-by-side
| Aspect | Self-hosted OpenClaw | EasyClaw |
|---|---|---|
| Installation | Docker, servers, env config | None — sign up and connect Telegram |
| Maintenance | You manage updates, uptime, scaling | We handle runtime and infrastructure |
| Control | Full control over stack and data location | Managed service; we run OpenClaw for you |
| Time to first chat | Hours or days (setup dependent) | Minutes |
| Best for | Teams that want full control and have DevOps | Individuals and teams that want ease of use |
Which is right for you?
Choose self-hosted
If you want full control over where data lives, how the runtime is configured, and the ability to customize everything, self-host OpenClaw.
Most popular
Choose EasyClaw
If you want ease of use and to focus on what your agent does rather than how it runs, choose EasyClaw. Same OpenClaw experience without installation or servers.